free hosting   image hosting   hosting reseller   online album   e-shop   famous people 
Free Website Templates
Free Installer

 

Presumption of Innocence

How come they treat me as if I am guilty when I am presumed innocent until proven otherwise?

By reading this page you will know what less then 1 in 1,000 know, and what many attorneys and Judges only think they know.

In an argument a presumption is what someone owns. Think of an argument as a scale. If both sides of the scale are equal the one that owns the presumption wins. A presumption can be a presumption of debt, a presumption of title and so on. As a defendant you own the "presumption of innocence".

Many confuse presumption with assumption or assertion. An assumption is a position that is not proven but because of the circumstances can be considered correct. An assertion is a claim made justifying the assumption. If challenged by the owner of the presumption, the Burden of proving the assertion is placed upon the party making the assertion. Failure to prove the assertion results in the owner of the presumption prevailing in the dispute.

In an arrest the person making the arrest warrants to the court (makes a type of guarantee) that there is a warrant (a link between a claim and evidence) to prove an assertion. In other words the arresting officer essentially swears to the court that there is sufficient evidence to prove his assertion that you are guilty.

If you do not challenge the assertion then you accept as fact the elements of the assertion and give up your ownership of the presumption. By pleading Not Guilty you are challenging the prosecutions assumption which is based on  assertion of guilt. Your presumption will prevail unless the party making the assertion can provide the link between the evidence presented and its claim. Without evidence a claim can not be proven and your presumption prevails.

Your presumption of innocence does not mean that the court believes you are innocent. On the contrary the court believes you are guilty because a warrantee has been made by a responsible party to the court that that they can make the link between proof and claim to outweigh your presumption.

Until such time when the assertion is tested your presumption prevails and you are innocent. However, since the prosecution has given its assurance, the court will assume you as being guilty even though you are presumed innocent. The court can place restrictions on you until such time when the prosecution has opportunity to present its evidence to prove its assertion.

The prosecutions assertion is not timeless. By making the assertion it also warrants that it has all the evidence it needs and needs no more evidence to prevail over your presumption. The prosecution assures the court that is ready for trial at a place and time of the courts choosing. To prevent indefinite delays as to the trial there are statute of limitations, time expiring points where if the assertion is not tested in a timely manner, it goes away. In that event the presumption prevails.

In short, the court will assume you are a criminal because of the warrantee made by the prosecution. The fact that you own your presumption of innocence and in fact are innocent is what the prosecution must overcome to gain a conviction.

It is not that you are innocent until proven guilty as many believe. It is that you are assumed guilty because of the assertion made and until your presumption of innocence prevails your protestation of innocence is simply the challenge to the prosecution to prove its case.

If the prosecutions assertion is not tested in a timely manner or if it fails in any way to prove its assertion then your presumption takes precedence.

Since you own the presumption you have nothing to prove. The court recognizes the fact that the presumption is yours. If the presumption is innocence you do not have to prove innocence as it is a given. The Burden of proving otherwise is upon the party making the assertion.

If the presumption were a presumption of title you would maintain the title unless the opposing party proved their assertion. However because of the conflict created the court can protect the party making the assertion by preventing you from selling the title until such time as the case is heard. In a similar way the court can have you jailed to prevent you from fleeing even though you still own the presumption.

Regardless, the court not only assumes you are guilty but it also considers your presumption of innocence as nothing more then an inconvenience.


 
 

 
 

MESSAGES

 

 

 

Reliable References

Why are innocent people so routinely framed? Is it just the pressure to convict?
Terrorism - Is it really a black and white issue?
Martha Stewart - If the juror is a liar, is he in a position to judge?
Michael Jackson - Is this a perpetual case of slinging mud to save face?
Robert F. Kennedy - Who was in fact his assassin?
Why aren't serious crimes ever solved? - Stealing the FBI file of the next, elected President is serious business.
Richard Clarke - Doesn't he sound like the counter-terrorist who kept America safe during the Clinton years?
Politics and Entertainment. - Does anybody think that Dennis Miller was funnier when he didn't admire anybody?
Dan Abrams is a fool - Please Do Not tamper with the Presumption of Innocence.
Election 2000 - Did voters select the candidate of their choice, or did they go to the polls to mark uncounted ballots?
Does the media promote the truth? - Not really, according to Professor Eric Alterman
Elian Gonzalez - If Bush was President of the United States, who would have rescued Elian Gonzalez?
John Ashcroft  - Is this what an Attorney General is supposed to do?
Dorothy Killgalen- Can anybody legitimately shut a door that has never been opened?
Image versus Reality  - Did Cosmetic Surgery help or hinder Linda Tripp and Paula Jones?  
Why is terrorism a political issue? - We are not supposed to know what we do not know, or something like that. 
Why did it take so long to arrest Scott Peterson?  - Why didn't the unremarkable scrutiny clear him?
The National Enquirer   - Why has the case against Scott Peterson survived, despite the failure to point to credible evidence?
If you are a competent Judge - You need to understand the serious difference between a reasonable fact and a selective opinion. 
Why are these obstructions of justice tolerated?  - It is an obstruction of justice to promote false evidence. 
Martha Moxley trial   - Did Ken Littleton murder Martha? 
Dominick Dunne is a Demagogue.  - Hilariously self-indulgent, Dominick Dunne is addicted to the image of a sleuth and the life of a thrill seeker.
The presumption of Guilt - The most perverted and misunderstood portion of our legal system
Witness  - Credibility Intact
Vivian Mitchell - Credibility unsuccessfully attacked. 
Convicting the Innocent - Why it happens on a regular basis.
John F. Kennedy - No room for deception. 
The assassination of President Kennedy  - A mystery by design intervention.
John Dean - Beyond Watergate 
Senator Paul Wellstone - A man of passion and character 
Inquisition - The real hatred 
Using Amber Frey - Easy Prey
Confessions - Highly overrated 
For whom the bell tolls  - Is it murder or is it suicide? 
Crystal clear  - The path to September 11, 2001.

 


 

 
NEWSWORLD SHOWDOWN
nsnews

 

 

Thanks for the message